Skip to content
CompareForexBrokers

Forex Hedging Strategies for Australian Traders (2026)

The hedging strategies retail and business traders actually use in Australia. Direct hedging, cross-currency hedging, triangular hedging, AUD examples, and the AU broker shortlist that allows opposing positions on the same account.

Written by Justin Grossbard Fact-checked by David Levy Last updated:

Our reviews are reader-supported. We may receive payment when you click a link to a partner site. Learn how we make money.

Summary, what hedging is and what it costs

Hedging is the practice of opening a position that offsets the risk of another position you already hold. The simplest form is opening a short EUR/USD trade equal in size to a long EUR/USD position you already have. Net market exposure is zero. You’re paying spreads and commissions on both legs without changing your directional risk.

Hedging is allowed on retail accounts at every major ASIC-regulated AU broker (Pepperstone, IC Markets, FP Markets, CMC, IG, Plus500 and others). It’s not allowed on US accounts under the NFA’s FIFO rule. AU traders coming from US-focused trading content sometimes assume hedging is restricted. It isn’t, in this jurisdiction.

The ATO generally treats hedging trades as ordinary income or loss for retail traders under TR 2005/15. There’s no special tax treatment for hedging positions versus speculative positions on a retail CFD account.

Three main retail use cases:

  1. News event protection, flatten exposure before high-impact data without closing the underlying trade
  2. Business FX exposure, Australian importers and exporters hedge AUD-denominated cash flows
  3. Portfolio currency exposure, investors with USD or EUR-denominated assets hedge the AUD translation risk

Costs of hedging are doubled spreads and commissions, doubled overnight financing (often net negative), and tied-up margin on both legs. There’s also limited upside while the hedge is in place. It’s a risk-management tool, not a profit-generation strategy.

What hedging actually means in forex

Hedging in trading is opening an offsetting position to neutralise some or all of the risk on an existing position. In forex, the most direct form is taking opposing long and short positions on the same currency pair. If you’re long 1 lot of AUD/USD and you open a short of 1 lot of AUD/USD, your net exposure to AUD/USD is zero. Whatever happens in the market, the long and short cancel out.

That sounds pointless. Why hold both positions when you could just close the original?

Three reasons retail traders do this rather than close out:

  • Tax timing, closing a position realises P&L in the current tax year. Hedging holds the realised event open while neutralising the directional risk.
  • Strategy switching, you might want to flatten exposure for a few hours over a high-impact news release without closing your longer-term position.
  • Position complexity, if your original position is part of a multi-leg structure, closing it means rebuilding the structure later. Hedging preserves the structure.

For business and institutional traders, hedging is more about cash flow protection. An Australian wine exporter expecting a USD 500,000 payment in 90 days is exposed to the AUD/USD rate on settlement. Locking in a forward or holding an offsetting CFD position protects the AUD-equivalent value.

ASIC and AU broker policy on hedging

This is where the AU context diverges most sharply from US trading content.

The US National Futures Association introduced a “FIFO” (First-In-First-Out) rule in 2009 that prevents US retail forex brokers from holding opposing positions on the same currency pair in the same account. If you’re long EUR/USD and you place a short EUR/USD order, the broker must close the long first. You can’t run both simultaneously.

ASIC has no equivalent rule. Australian retail accounts can hold opposing positions on the same pair concurrently. Every major ASIC-regulated broker we cover allows this:

BrokerDirect hedging on same accountNotes
PepperstoneAllowedMT4/MT5/cTrader all support hedging mode
IC MarketsAllowedHedging supported on MT4, MT5 and cTrader
FP MarketsAllowedStandard MT4/MT5 hedging account default
CMC MarketsAllowedNext Generation platform supports opposing positions
IG MarketsAllowedBoth proprietary platform and MT4
OANDAAllowedOANDA is one of the few brokers that operates in both AU (allowed) and US (not allowed via OANDA US entity)
EightcapAllowedMT4/MT5 hedging mode default
Fusion MarketsAllowedMT4/MT5 standard hedging support
VantageAllowedMT4/MT5/TradingView
Plus500AllowedProprietary WebTrader supports opposing positions

Note that on MT5, “hedging mode” is the account type that allows opposing positions. The alternative MT5 account type is “netting mode” which automatically nets opposing orders. AU brokers default new MT5 accounts to hedging mode unless you specifically request netting.

There’s no separate ASIC rule on hedging. The standard PIO retail protections still apply: 30:1 leverage cap on majors, 50% margin close-out, negative balance protection. Both legs of a hedged position consume margin, so you’re using twice the margin you would for a single directional position.

Direct hedging, same pair, opposing positions

The simplest form. Open both a long and a short on the same currency pair, equal in size. Net market exposure is zero.

How a direct hedge looks on AUD/USD

You’re long 1 lot of AUD/USD at 0.6500. The price has moved to 0.6450 (50 pips against you, USD 500 of unrealised loss on a 100,000-unit position). You don’t want to close the long because you still expect the price to recover, but you also don’t want more downside if it falls further before US payrolls in three days.

You open a short of 1 lot of AUD/USD at 0.6450. From this point, your net P&L on the pair is locked. If AUD/USD falls to 0.6400, the long loses another USD 500 and the short gains USD 500. If it rises to 0.6500, the long gains USD 500 and the short loses USD 500. The net position is flat.

You’re paying:

  • Spread on the new short (one-way, about USD 5 to USD 10 depending on broker)
  • Overnight financing on both legs (typically net negative, costing AUD 1 to AUD 5 per night per lot for AUD/USD)
  • Margin on both legs (so AUD 3,333 of initial margin on each at 30:1, total AUD 6,666 of margin used)

After the news release, you close the short. Now you’re back to your original directional exposure on the long. If the price moved in your favour during the hedge, you’ve made money on the now-closed short. If it moved against, you’ve crystallised more loss on the short while the long has either recovered or fallen further.

Pros and cons of direct hedging

Pros:

  • Locks in current P&L on the original position without realising it
  • Lets you protect against specific event risk (news, weekend gaps) without closing the directional view
  • Simple to execute and reverse
  • Works on every ASIC-regulated AU broker

Cons:

  • Doubled spread and commission costs vs single-position management
  • Net negative overnight financing on most pairs (you pay both sides, you don’t earn on either)
  • Margin used on both legs (twice the capital tied up)
  • No upside while the hedge is in place, you’ve neutralised your own position
  • Tax timing only works if your strategy actually plans to lift the hedge later. If you don’t, you might as well have just closed.

For most retail traders, just closing the position is cheaper and simpler. Hedging earns its place when there’s a specific structural reason to hold both sides open.

Cross-currency hedging

Cross-currency hedging uses the correlation between two different pairs to offset risk. The classic example is hedging AUD exposure with a related but not identical pair.

AUD/USD long hedged with USD/CAD long

Suppose you’re long AUD/USD and you want to reduce your USD risk without closing the AUD/USD position. AUD/USD and USD/CAD have a moderately strong positive correlation when the USD is the dominant driver (both pairs move on USD strength).

You open a long USD/CAD position. If the USD strengthens, AUD/USD falls (your long loses) and USD/CAD rises (your long gains). The two partially offset. If the USD weakens, AUD/USD rises (long gains) and USD/CAD falls (long loses), again offsetting.

The hedge isn’t perfect. AUD/USD also responds to commodity prices, RBA policy, China data, and risk-on/risk-off sentiment. USD/CAD responds to oil prices and BoC policy. The correlation is meaningful but partial.

Cross-currency hedging suits traders who want to hedge a specific risk factor (USD exposure) rather than the full P&L on a position. It’s more common in institutional and wholesale forex than in retail.

Other common cross hedges

  • EUR/USD short hedged with USD/CHF long, EUR and CHF tend to move together against the USD, so a long USD/CHF offsets the USD short embedded in EUR/USD short
  • GBP/USD long hedged with EUR/USD long, both share USD-side risk
  • AUD/USD long hedged with NZD/USD short, both Antipodean currencies, moderate correlation

These work as partial hedges, not full neutralisations. You’re trading some directional risk for offsetting commodity-currency or risk-sentiment risk.

Triangular hedging

Triangular hedging uses three pairs that share two currencies. The classic example uses AUD/USD, EUR/USD and EUR/AUD.

If you’re long AUD/USD and short EUR/USD, you have a synthetic long EUR/AUD position (because being long AUD against USD and short EUR against USD is equivalent to being long AUD against EUR, which is being short EUR/AUD). You could close out the synthetic by trading EUR/AUD directly.

In practice, triangular setups are rarely used as retail risk management. They’re more common in:

  • Arbitrage (profiting from temporary mispricing between three pairs that should net to zero)
  • Carry trade construction (combining pairs to express a view on interest rate differentials)
  • Wholesale FX market making (managing inventory across crosses)

For most retail Australian traders, direct hedging on the same pair is far simpler and serves the same risk-management purpose.

Real use cases, when hedging makes sense for AU traders

News event protection

You’re holding a swing trade on AUD/USD over a US CPI release. You don’t want to close the position because your thesis is multi-day. But you also don’t want the trade to potentially gap 80 to 100 pips on the print. Solution: open an offsetting short ahead of the release, hold through the announcement, close the short once the volatility settles. You’ve paid one spread and a few hours of net financing in exchange for flat exposure during the event window.

This is the most common retail use of hedging in our experience surveying AU traders.

Business FX exposure

A Sydney-based importer is paying USD 200,000 to a US supplier in 60 days. The current AUDUSD rate is 0.65, so the AUD-equivalent cost today would be roughly AUD 308,000. If the AUD weakens to 0.60 by settlement, the AUD-equivalent cost rises to AUD 333,000. That’s AUD 25,000 of unhedged FX risk on a 60-day exposure.

Hedging options for the importer:

  • Forward contract through a bank or specialist FX provider (most common for businesses)
  • Short AUD/USD CFD held for 60 days (locks in the rate at the cost of overnight financing)
  • AUD/USD options (forward extra protection at higher cost)

For SMB importers and exporters, the bank forward is usually the cleanest option. CFD-based hedging via a retail broker is less common at business scale because of margin requirements and the need to roll positions if the timing extends.

Portfolio currency exposure

An Australian investor holds USD 500,000 of US tech stocks via a stock broker like Interactive Brokers. The AUD-equivalent value of the portfolio fluctuates with AUDUSD. If the AUD strengthens, the AUD value of the USD portfolio falls.

The investor can hedge the FX exposure by holding a long AUD/USD CFD (or equivalent forward) of approximately the same notional value. If AUDUSD rises, the AUD portfolio value falls, but the long AUD/USD CFD gains. Net AUD value of the position is more stable.

This is a known strategy among Australian self-directed investors with international portfolios. The cost is the financing on the CFD position (which can run AUD 30 to 50 per month per AUD 100,000 of notional, depending on the rate environment).

Risks and downsides of hedging

Doubled costs

Every leg of a hedge costs spread, possible commission, and overnight financing. Two legs running concurrently cost twice as much as a single position. Over weeks of holding, the financing alone can erode any benefit from the hedge.

Margin tied up

Both legs of a direct hedge consume margin. So a 1-lot AUD/USD long plus 1-lot AUD/USD short uses twice the initial margin of a single position. On a small account, this can leave very little free margin for new opportunities or for absorbing adverse moves on either leg.

Limited upside

While the hedge is in place, you’ve neutralised your own directional view. If the market moves favourably for the original position, the hedge offsets that gain. The trade-off is your downside protection comes at the cost of upside elimination.

Execution and slippage

In fast markets (around major news, or thin overnight liquidity), placing two opposing orders can produce execution slippage on both legs. You can end up locking in a spread loss bigger than you intended.

Tax treatment

For retail Australian CFD traders, the ATO generally treats hedging trades the same as speculative trades under TR 2005/15. Profits and losses on the hedge legs are assessable income or deductible loss in the year realised. There’s no separate “hedge accounting” treatment for retail forex on a CFD account. Speak to a registered tax agent about your circumstances.

For businesses using hedging for genuine commercial FX exposure (importer/exporter cash flows), different tax treatments may apply (TOFA rules under Division 230 of the Income Tax Assessment Act 1997). Business hedging is outside the scope of this education page.

FAQs

Is forex hedging allowed in Australia?
Yes. Every major ASIC-regulated broker we cover allows direct hedging on retail accounts (Pepperstone, IC Markets, FP Markets, CMC Markets, IG Markets, OANDA, Plus500 and others). The US NFA FIFO rule that prevents opposing positions on the same pair doesn't apply in Australia. ASIC has no equivalent restriction.
Does hedging cost more than a single position?
Yes. Hedging means paying spread and possible commission on both legs of the hedge. Overnight financing applies to both positions, typically netting negative. Margin is used on both legs. Over time, the cost of holding a hedge can be material, especially for positions held weeks or months.
What's the difference between direct and cross-currency hedging?
Direct hedging opens an opposing position on the same currency pair, fully neutralising market exposure. Cross-currency hedging uses a correlated but different pair to offset specific risk factors (typically USD exposure), accepting some residual risk in exchange for access to different financing rates or position sizes.
Are forex hedging profits taxed differently in Australia?
For retail CFD traders, hedging profits and losses are generally taxed the same as speculative trades, as assessable income under ATO Taxation Ruling TR 2005/15. There's no special hedge accounting on a retail CFD account. Businesses using hedging for genuine commercial FX exposure may fall under different rules (TOFA, Division 230). Speak to a registered tax agent about your circumstances.
Why would I hedge instead of just closing the position?
Three common reasons. First, to delay realising P&L for tax timing purposes. Second, to flatten exposure temporarily over a specific event (news release, weekend gap) without closing your longer-term view. Third, to preserve a multi-leg position structure that would be costly to rebuild if you closed and re-opened.
Which AU broker is best for hedging?
Any of the major ASIC-regulated brokers (Pepperstone, IC Markets, FP Markets, CMC, IG, OANDA) supports hedging on retail accounts. The differences come down to platform support (all support MT4/MT5 hedging mode; cTrader and proprietary platforms vary), spread and commission costs (lowest cost matters when you're paying both legs), and available currency pairs. For lowest-cost direct hedging on majors, IC Markets Raw and Pepperstone Razor are typically the most cost-efficient.

About the author

Justin Grossbard headshot

Justin Grossbard

Justin co-founded CompareForexBrokers in 2014 and has traded forex since 1998. Based in Melbourne, he has tested every ASIC-regulated broker on this site personally and has written for Forbes, Kiplinger, Finance Magnates, the Australian Financial Review and The Age. He holds a Bachelor of Commerce (Honours) and a Master's in Marketing from Monash University. Justin is the Strategic Head of Research for the site.

LinkedIn · X / Twitter